Security of PowerDNS

PowerDNS has several options to easily allow it to run more securely. Most notable are the chroot, setuid and setgid options.

For Security Advisories, see the dedicated page.

PowerDNS Security Policy

If you have a security problem to report, please email us at both and In case you want to encrypt your report using PGP, please use:

Please do not mail security issues to public lists, nor file a ticket, unless we do not get back to you in a timely manner. We fully credit reporters of security issues, and respond quickly, but please allow us a reasonable timeframe to coordinate a response.

We remind PowerDNS and dnsdist users that under the terms of the GNU General Public License, PowerDNS and dnsdist come with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This license is included in this documentation.

If you believe you have found a security vulnerability that applies to DNS implementations generally, and you want to report this responsibly to a number of implementers, you might consider also using the Open Source DNS Vulnerability mailing list, managed by DNS-OARC.


Security issues can also be reported on our YesWeHack page and might fetch a bounty. Do note that only the PowerDNS software is in scope for the YesWeHack program, not our websites or other infrastructure.

Disclosure Policy

  • Let us know as soon as possible upon discovery of a potential security issue, and we’ll make every effort to quickly resolve the issue.
  • Provide us a reasonable amount of time to resolve the issue before any disclosure to the public or a third-party.
  • We will always credit researchers in our Security Advisories.

For additional information on PowerDNS security, PowerDNS security incidents and PowerDNS security policy, see PowerDNS Security Policy.

Securing the Process

Running as a less privileged identity

By specifying setuid and setgid, PowerDNS changes to this identity shortly after binding to the privileged DNS ports. These options are highly recommended. It is suggested that a separate identity is created for PowerDNS as the user ‘nobody’ is in fact quite powerful on most systems.

Both these parameters can be specified either numerically or as real names. Set these parameters immediately if they are not set!

Jailing the process in a chroot

Modern Linux distributions, with systemd for process management, do a better job of constraining PowerDNS than chroot can. We strongly suggest using distribution/OS features for process containment instead of the chroot option. The text below is kept for those users that have specific reasons to prefer chroot. chroot functionality is not actively tested during development and might break during upgrades.

The chroot option secures PowerDNS to its own directory so that even if it should become compromised and under control of external influences, it will have a hard time affecting the rest of the system.

Even though this will hamper hackers a lot, chroot jails have been known to be broken.


When chrooting The PowerDNS, take care that backends will be able to get to their files. Many databases need access to a UNIX domain socket which should live within the chroot. It is often possible to hardlink such a socket into the chroot dir.

When running with primary or secondary support, be aware that many operating systems need access to specific libraries (often /lib/libnss*) in order to support resolution of domain names! You can also hardlink these.

In addition, make sure that /dev/log is available from within the chroot. Logging will silently fail over time otherwise (on logrotate).

The default PowerDNS configuration is best chrooted to ./, which boils down to the configured location of the controlsocket.

This is achieved by adding the following to pdns.conf: chroot=./, and restarting PowerDNS.

Security Considerations

In general, make sure that the PowerDNS process is unable to execute commands on your backend database. Most database backends will only need SELECT privilege. Take care to not connect to your database as the ‘root’ or ‘sa’ user, and configure the chosen user to have very slight privileges.

Databases empathically do not need to run on the same machine that runs PowerDNS! In fact, in benchmarks it has been discovered that having a separate database machine actually improves performance.

Separation will enhance your database security highly. Recommended.

Security Polling

PowerDNS products can poll the security status of their respective versions. This polling, naturally, happens over DNS. If the result is that a given version has a security problem, the software will report this at level ‘Error’ during startup, and repeatedly during operations.

By default, security polling happens on the domain ‘’, but this can be changed with the security-poll-suffix. If this setting is made empty, no polling will take place. Organizations wanting to host their own security zones can do so by changing this setting to a domain name under their control.

To make this easier, the zone used to host is available.

To enable distributors of PowerDNS to signal that they have backported versions, the PACKAGEVERSION compilation-time macro can be used to set a distributor suffix.


PowerDNS software sadly sometimes has critical security bugs. Even though we send out notifications of these via all channels available, we find that not everybody actually find out about our security releases.

To solve this, PowerDNS software will start polling for security notifications, and log these periodically. Secondly, the security status of the software will be reported using the built-in metrics. This allows operators to poll for the PowerDNS security status and alert on it.

In the implementation of this idea, we have taken the unique role of operating system distributors into account. Specifically, we can deal with backported security fixes.

Finally, this feature can be disabled, or operators can have the automated queries point at their own status service.


PowerDNS software periodically tries to resolve ‘|TXT’ or ‘’.

The data returned is in one of the following forms:

  • NXDOMAIN or resolution failure -> 0
  • “1 Ok” -> 1
  • “2 Upgrade recommended for security reasons, see …” -> 2
  • “3 Upgrade mandatory for security reasons, see …” -> 3

In cases 2 or 3, periodic logging commences. Case 2 can also be issued for non-security related upgrade recommendations for pre-releases. The metric security-status is set to 2 or 3 respectively. If at a later date, resolution fails, the security-status is not reset to 1. It could be lowered however if we discover the security status is less urgent than we thought.

If resolution fails, and the previous security-status was 1, the new security-status becomes 0 (‘no data’). If the security-status was higher than 1, it will remain that way, and not get set to 0.

In this way, security-status of 0 really means ‘no data’, and cannot mask a known problem.


Distributions frequently backport security fixes to the PowerDNS versions they ship. This might lead to a version number that is known to us to be insecure to be secure in reality.

To solve this issue, PowerDNS can be compiled with a distribution setting which will move the security polls from: ‘’ to ‘

Note two things, one, there is a separate namespace for debian, and secondly, we use the package version of this release. This allows us to know that 4.0.1-1 (say) is insecure, but that 4.0.1-2 is not.

Configuration Details

The configuration setting security-poll-suffix is by default set to ‘’. If empty, nothing is polled. This can be moved to ‘’.

If compiled with PACKAGEVERSION=3.1.6-abcde.debian, queries will be sent to “”.


If a distribution wants to host its own file with version information, we can delegate to their nameservers directly.

Trusting zone files

In some scenarios the PowerDNS server must handle zone files coming from an untrusted third party. For these cases, it is recommended to take extra protective measures in addition to the measures above:

Depending on your specific requirements, it might be good perform checks on zone files before loading the zone into PowerDNS to:

  • Enforce reasonable TTL values.
  • Enforce reasonable values in the SOA records.
  • Validate delegations.
  • Enforce a reasonable maximum for the total number of records.
  • Enforce a reasonable maximum for the number of records per record set.